Southwest airlines Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Southwest airlines - Assignment Example To understand the results of the deregulation, it is vital to apply Porter’s Five Forces analysis of the company. The extent to which rivalry thrives usually affects the general profitability of the airline. The concentration of the market is a major issue which affects rivalry. Routes, hubs and airports operated by several carriers experienced strong rivalry Ahlstrom and Bruton (2009). Factors contributing to this rivalry include high and fixed costs, price wars, excess capacity, easily accessible prices through the Internet and low differentiation. Among the competitors of Southwest Airlines include AMR Corporation, Air France-KLM, United Continental Holdings, Inc., British Airways Plc, Delta Air Lines Inc., and Continental Airlines, Inc.. The competitors have seen the Southwest Airline’s fare prices and prit margines godown as they have cut a share of the company’s market. During the first about ten years of deregulation, the airline industry experienced a lot of entrants with 22 new airlines being established according to Desai, Patel and Quach. This entrance of new airlines implied that the airline industry was to experience inefficient economies of scales hence couldn’t support a lot of new entrants. Economists predicted fewer barriers to entry in the market and new firms were likely to organize airlines and new assets to new routes. However it was later observed that there could only exist eight major carriers. The increase the major carriers to eleven would lead to eight of them filing for bankruptcy, disappearing or merging. The various substitutes to air travel include road transport, trail transport, and water transport. However, the significance of trains, ships, and buses as airline substitutes has significantly declined over time. Exchanging costs between air travel and others substitutes are literally low according to Duggan (2003).

Organisational Business Practices Essay Example for Free

Organisational Business Practices Essay Organization is a principle of life. We seek the help of organizations to meet our day to day requirements such as to feeding, clothing, educating entertaining, protecting etc. However, organizations are not contemporary creations. Modern society has more organizations which are fulfilling a larger category of societal and personal needs. Organizations are so encompassing in the modern life that it is sometimes easy to overlook that each may be regarded as an entity with a specific contribution and specific goals. Organization is a system of consciously coordinated activities of two or more persons in order to achieve a common goal. It is a system of four major internal interacting components such as: task, people, technology and structure. Organizations are said to be open systems. A number of metaphors can be used to think and explain about the nature of organization. There are eight archetypical metaphors of organization: Machines, Organisms, Brains, Cultures, Political Systems, Psychic Prisons, Flux and Transformation, Instruments of Domination. General Discussion Document: Director of Marketing is proposing to introduce a new process of sales at Superior Sales Corporation for which there will be changes as per the present set up. Staff are likely to resist the change hence some suggestions are placed to reduce the resistance. Organization Structure: Functional superiority can only be achieved if there is enough reliability and focus within each business unit. Elites are those specialized organizational units with closeness to power and having superior capability. Their functions signify a particular organization’s typical capability. It is, important that more than one such elite function exist. They need to be complementary so as to make sure that they serve as a check on another. Pluralist are those essential forces that play a important role in decision making. The tension that is created amongst these forces stimulates thoughts and lead to self-improvement and competitiveness, Elite functions bring main strengths to an organization, but must assist with the whole to attain shared results. The stronger and more competent the elites are, the more difficult it is to achieve cross-functional teamwork. The organization’s challenge is therefore to ensure that these functions are on a par with that of competition, but at the same time they need to ensure that they respond to market demands by cutting across these functional compartments. Organization Cultures: Organizations are mini-societies that have their own distinctive patterns of culture. Culture is a modern concept used in a social sense to refer broadly to civilization and social system. Its increasing use within the social sciences has led to definitions of varying generality, which develop in a host of ways. Culture is that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, law, morals, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society. There is a growing literature of relevance how organization can be understood as a cultural phenomenon. It is valuable to understand the relationship between culture and industrialization. The greatest strength of this metaphor is that it shows how organizations rests in shared systems of meaning, values, ideologies, beliefs and other social practices that ultimately shape and guide organized action. Reactive and Proactive Changes: Forces for change arise out of an organization’s interaction with elements in its external or internal environment. The action of competitors, suppliers, government units or public groups may have substantial impacts on change. Social and cultural factors such as life styles, values or beliefs also lead to important changes. Forces of change may also arise from within an organization depending upon different phases of growth or demands made by different interest groups. Reactive changes occur when these forces make it necessary for a change to be implemented. Proactive change takes place when some forces to change lead an organization to conclude that a particular change is desirable and goes about in initiating the change in a planned manner. The difference between reactive and proactive changes corresponds to that between reflexive behavior and purposive behavior. Reactive change, like reflexive behavior, involves a limited part of the system whereas proactive change and purposive behavior coordinate the parts of the system as a whole. Organizational change has noted that many participants respond with dogged resistance to altering the status quo. In the industrial phenomenon workers have at times sought, in extremely violent fashion, to block the introduction of new technology. Supervisors and lower level managers have balked at large scale projects in job redesign and job enrichment; even low level employees, the presumed beneficiaries of such projects, have fought such changes. Senior managers have fought pitched battles against realignment of corporate structure. Even the proposal by a course coordinator to adopt a different style of presenting the report is capable of touching off a frenzy of defensive tactics to resist change. Such behavior may be either overt or covert. Overt resistance may take the form of employees deliberately failing to do the things necessary for successful change or simply being unenthusiastic about the change. The absence of overt resistance does not mean that resistance is not present, as resistance may be hidden from direct observation. Covert resistance can be more detrimental to change than open resistance because it is harder to identify and eliminate. There are at least two sets of factors which explain the process of resistance. One set relates to the personality and the other relates to the social system. Decreasing the Resistance: Managers who have been responsible for implementation have developed personal perspective consisting of assumption and strong feelings about how change should be introduced. These philosophies fall into two camps, either tops-down or bottoms-up. The Tops-down Strategy: The advocates of this strategy believe that, in general, people resist changes and require direction and structure for their well being as well as to work efficiently and effectively. The basic psychological contract between employees and management, it is assumed, is one in which the employee provides work, effort and commitment and expects in return pay, benefits, and a clear definition of what is expected to be done. It follows that it is the management’s responsibility to design the changes it deems appropriate and to implement these thoroughly but quickly by directives from the top. The Bottoms-up Strategy The advocates of this approach profess what to them is a more enlightened view of human nature. They argue that people welcome change and the opportunity to contribute to their own productivity, especially if the change gives them more variety in their work and more autonomy. These managers assume people have a psychological contract which includes an expectation that they be involved in designing change as well as in implementing it. Commitment to change, they say, follows from involvement in the total change process and is essential to successful implementation.

Homelessness Essays -- Homeless families, social reform, outreach

Homelessness is a serious problem in our society. Every night in our nation thousands of people are on the streets. This type of behavior is considered deviant because it does not reflect the norms and values of our society. In many cases the homeless people in our country are treated as total outcasts. Many of these people have severe mental disorders. Some are victims of an economy that has failed them. One may ask how such harsh situations exist in such an advanced society. With all the money and programs created to help people it seems ridiculous that this behavior exists. In a society where people have so much how is it possible that there are still people that have so little. The homeless are humans, no different than anyone else. They have rights and privileges just as any other citizen. As fellow humans we are obligated to help those in need. The homeless are in need. They are not only in need of money, but they are also in need of our attention and our support. Homelessness is something that we as a society need to address and eliminate completely. In the past few years the number of homeless people has increased tremendously gaining the attention of the public eye. While there is debate over how many homeless people are in the United States, few disagree that the numbers are overwhelmingly high and they are growing. In the past the homeless population mainly consisted of white men who were alcoholics. Now the homeless consists of many different types of people ranging in ethical background. They have also become a younger group of people and have a variety of different reasons for their homelessness (Farr, 1986). Homeless people have no bed to keep warm in if they get a fever or if the weather is cold. They do no... ...ington: University Press of Kentucky. Works Consulted Children's Defense Fund. (1998). The state of America's children: A report from the Children's Defense Fund. Boston: Beacon Press. Fitchen, J. (1981). Poverty in rural America: A case study. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Gans, H. J. (1995). The war against the poor: The underclass and antipoverty policy. New York: BasicBooks. Garrett, P. (1996). Poor kids in a rich nation: Eating the seed corn. In Pathways from poverty educational network. University Park, PA: Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development. (ED 406 080) Katz, M. B. (1990). The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare. New York: Pantheon Books. Kryder-Coe, J. H., Salamon, L. M., & Molnar, J. M. (Eds.). (1991). Homeless children and youth: A new American dilemma. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Gardners Multiple Intelligences Musical Intelligence Education Essay

This paper conducted By Donovan A. McFarlane in Spring 2011 to analyze Gardeners Multiple Intelligence theory as the most practical and active platform for twenty-first century educational and instructional methods constructed on the appreciative differences in today ‘s schoolrooms and educational establishments. It deals with the sole potencies and features of single scholars, the opportunities that arise from using the thoughts of multiple intelligences, the demand for flexibleness and version in a world-wide humanity, and the turning demand for duty at all degrees of instruction. Numerous definitions of intelligence are shown in his paper to analyze the theories of Sternberg and Goleman as supportive surveies of Gardener ‘s MI as being the most effectual platform for twenty-first century in the educational and instructional Fieldss.IntroductionAssorted theories of intelligence are widespread in educational and psychological field. Some of those theories deal with remarkable intelligence and some as Gardner ‘s multiple intelligences concerns with diverseness. Each theory has its ain position point of view which affected educational and instructional methodological analysiss. Multiple intelligences ( MI ) consist of many subdivisions of single accomplishments and prospective attacks harmonizing to their acquisition manners. IN ( MI ) theory, Gardner ( 2011a ) believes that there are nine separating types of intelligences: spacial intelligence, naturalist intelligence, interpersonal intelligence, intrapersonal intelligence, lingual intelligence, logi cal-mathematical intelligence, musical-rhythmic intelligence, bodily kinaesthetic intelligence and experiential intelligence. ( McFarlane, 2011 )Gardner ‘s Multiple IntelligencesMusical IntelligenceIt deals with ability of an person in acknowledging the public presentation, composing, and grasp of musical forms. It includes the capableness to place and represent musical pitches, tones, and beat. Gardner believes that musical intelligence relates to structural equivalent to lingual intelligence.Linguistic IntelligenceSpoken and written linguistic communication is the most effectual concern of lingual intelligence. The ability to larn linguistic communications, and the ability of utilizing a linguistic communication to accomplish specific purposes and to show one ‘s ends verbally or rhythmically. An single uses the linguistic communication as a agency to retrieve informations and information. poets, attorneies, authors and talkers are among those that an effectual lingual intelligence as Gardener references.Bodily-Kinesthetic IntelligenceIt relates to utilizing one ‘s whole organic structure or parts of the organic structure to work out jobs potentially. It concerns with the accomplishment to utilize mental abilities to harmonise them with bodily actions and activities efficaciously. Howard Gardner respects mental and physical activity as related.Spatial IntelligenceIt relates to the possibility of acknowledging and utilizing the assorted forms of broad infinite and more limited countries in educational and instructional Fieldss.Interpersonal IntelligenceConcerned with the ability to understand the intents, stimulation, demands, wants and desires of other people. It relates to working in groups successfully with other squads. Religious, pedagogues, sales representative, and political leaders and counsellors all need a well-developed.Intrapersonal IntelligenceIt deals with understanding oneself successfully, grasp of one ‘s feelings, frigh ts and motives efficaciously. Harmonizing to Howard Gardner ‘s sentiment, it involves holding an effectual working theoretical account of ourselves, and to be capable to utilize such informations, facts and impressions to command and standardise our lives.Naturalist IntelligenceIt describes the human capableness to separate from other life animals ( workss, animate beings ) every bit good as understanding to other characteristics of the natural universe as trees, clouds, skies, stone constellations, H2O supplies and so on.Experiential IntelligenceUnderstanding and being able to dispute and track deep enquiries about human being, such as what does life intend? why do we populate? Why do we decease? and how did we acquire here. Harmonizing to the inventor of multiple intelligences theory, Howard Gardner, â€Å" intelligence can be defined in three ways as: ( I ) a belongings of all human existences ; ( two ) a dimension on which human existences differ ; and ( three ) the ways in which 1 carries out a undertaking in virtuousness of one ‘s ends † ( Gardner, 2011a, p. nine ) . Gardner believes that the dense base for ( MI ) theory lies in bio-psychological possibilities that range across cultural surroundings. Some bookmans supported Gardener ‘s and Hatch ‘s positions of MI theory. Two of the most noteworthy illustrations are Robert J. Sternberg and Daniel Goleman. McFarlane states â€Å" The very definitions of intelligence provided by both these theoreticians reflect the same withdrawal from hidebound theories of intelligence that is espoused by Gardner. Sternberg ( 2004 ) defines intelligence as â€Å" accomplishment in accomplishing whatever it is you want to achieve in your life within your sociocultural context by capitalising on your strengths and counterbalancing for, or rectifying, your failings † ( p.1 ) . Goleman ( 1995 ) differs merely somewhat by holding a more â€Å" remarkable † definition of intelligence † : emotion. He defines intelligence as â€Å" abilities such as being able to actuate oneself and prevail in the face of defeats ; to command impulse and delay satisfaction ; to modulate one ‘s tempers and maintain hurt from drenchin g the ability to believe ; to sympathize, and to trust † ( p.285 ) . Goleman calls this â€Å" Emotional Intelligence ( EI ) † and believes that it accounts for 80 % of success in persons † .Why Multiple Intelligences is the Most Effective PlatformThe developed theory of MI by Dr. Howard Gardner is based on the consideration that people learn devouring of assorted sorts of intelligences as Griggs et Al. provinces in 2009. This shows that people differs in geting and larning cognition harmonizing to their single differences and bio-psychological and cultural factors which affect their accomplishments and abilities. MI among different intelligence theories has its exceeding platform covering with human diverseness characterizing persons, and therefore leads to a more effectual and useful attack to turn to alone scholars in the schoolroom. Comparing MI theory to other theories of heads or human potency is surely the most operative and active platform upon which to better educational and instructional methodological analysiss for the schoolroom of the twenty-first century. We live in a truthfully international society where assortment of worlds has become the most of import and important characteristic of societal life. This diverseness is noticeable in the twenty-first century school and schoolroom where pupils from all Marches of life ( stand foring diverse linguistic communications, civilizations, civilisations, nationalities, faiths, and socialization-backgroundsaa‚ ¬ † non to advert alone single personalities ) meet in a remarkable topographic point where the teacher must be able to ease huge differences. Merely multiple intelligences ( MI ) hold the influence and indispensable prospective for teachers or pedagogues to develop elastic and wide adequate methodological analysiss and larning manners to turn to this different scholars with their assorted skill sets or abilities. Harmonizing to Donovan, † Further grounds of the toughness of multiple intelligences as the most suited and effectual platform for twenty-first century instructional and educational methodological analysiss can be gleaned from the application of assorted engineerings in the acquisition procedure. † As engineering is the facet of the new age, we should incorporate it in our educational system assorted with MI in order to make a new kingdom of modern direction. Besides, Gardener ‘s outgrowth of Emotional Intelligence ( EI ) has besides brought new apprehension of intelligence that makes MI theory more ambitious and effectual because incorporating â€Å" emotion † allows for even greater comparatively and subjectiveness in the definition of what truly constitutes intelligence. Furthermore, developed societal interaction and interpersonal accomplishments and increased their importance of specifying intelligence as a wider scope of human capablenesss which helps t o show an apprehension of single inimitability as the moderating characteristic in intelligence.DecisionAs one of assorted factors that influence educational and instructional procedure, intelligence has its ain affect in planing a new attack which helps pedagogues and teachers to cover with the diverseness and single singularity of the scholars in one acquisition environment by utilizing different acquisition manners. MI theory draws back the advancement and differences between the modern centuries and old 1s by delegating new attacks and integrates them into educational system as turning our positions of the instructional methodological analysiss and turn toing diverseness, single accomplishments and integrates them with engineering as a consequence of globalisation. As Donovan provinces, † Education is now a planetary procedure and â€Å" Education should embrace a assortment of methods in order to reflect kids ‘s different acquisition manners † ( Silverstein, 1999, P. 18 ) . † So harmonizing to Donovan ‘s point of position on his research paper which titled as Multiple Intelligences: The Most Effective Platform for Global twenty-first Century Educational and Instructional Methodologies, â€Å" Gardner ‘s MI theory therefore represents the most effectual platform for planetary twenty-first century educational and instructional methodological analysiss and those pedagogues who embrace this position will happen themselves run intoing and exceling stakeholders ‘ demands for answerability in the schoolroom and instruction. † As pedagogues and teachers of this new age, we have to encompass differences in a truly diverse society of the twenty-first century.

Do the Benefits of Globalization Outweighs Its Disadvantages Essay

ORGANIC FARMING (Farming without the addition of artificial chemicals.) Organic farming can be defined by the proactive, ecological management strategies that maintain and enhance soil fertility, prevent soil erosion, promote and enhance biological diversity, and minimize risk to human and animal health and natural resources. It can also be defined as Vegetable and livestock production using natural sources of nutrients (such as compost, crop residues, and manure) and natural methods of crop and weed control, instead of using synthetic or inorganic agrochemicals. It is also called low input farming. Many kinds of farm products are produced organically including vegetables, fruit, herbs, grains, meat, dairy, eggs, fibers, and flowers. In the past organic farm production was often considered as being only for radicals or hippies. Now it is seen as a viable economic move – with benefits to the farm soil, to the environment, and to the purchasers of the products. An organic approach can contribute towards making a farm more financially viable in several ways. * First, it is a low input way of farming. You do not need to invest so much money in expensive chemicals and fertilizers. However, any declines in initial production are balanced against these reduced costs. * Second, it is less likely to result in land degradation than many other production methods; hence the long-term cost of sustaining production is less. * Thirdly, public demand for organic produce has markedly increased over recent years. The key characteristics of organic farming include; 1| Protecting the long term fertility of soils by maintaining organic matter levels, encouraging soil biological activity, and careful mechanical intervention.| 2| Providing crop nutrients indirectly using relatively insoluble nutrient sources which are made available to the plant by the action of soil micro-organisms.| 3| Nitrogen self-sufficiency through the use of legumes and biological nitrogen fixation, as well as effective recycling of organic materials including crop residues and livestock manures.| 4| Weed, disease and pest control relying primarily on crop rotations, natural predators, diversity, organic manuring, resistant varieties and limited (preferably minimal) thermal, biological and chemical intervention.| 5| The extensive management of livestock, paying full regard to their evolutionary adaptations, behavioral needs and animal welfare issues with respect to nutrition, housing, health, breeding and rearing.| 6| Careful attention to the impact of the farming system on the wider environment and the conservation of wildlife and natural habitats. TYPES OF ORGANIC FARMING Organic farming works with nature, rather than against it. It recognises the fact that nature has many complex processes which interact to control pests, diseases and weeds, and to regulate the growth of plants. There is a variety of ways of growing plants that work with nature rather than against it. Some techniques have been used for centuries. Some of the most effective and widely used methods are:Poly-culture Theoretically, it is better for the long-term welfare of the land to avoid a monoculture approach to farming. Monocultures tend to utilize the same nutrients from the soil and deposit the same â€Å"pollutants† into the soil; causing nutrient deficiencies and pollutant toxicities. When several different plants, and/or animals are growing together, the waste products of one will often be used by another; and the nutrients used by one, may be replenished by the activity of another.Biodynamic farmingIt views the farm or garden as a â€Å"total† organism and attemp ts to develop a sustainable system, where all of the components of the living system have a respected and proper place.| Permaculture Systems Permaculture is a system of agriculture based on perennial, or self perpetuating, plant and animal species which are useful to man. It is a philosophy which encompasses the establishment of environments which are highly productive and stable, and which provide food, shelter, energy etc., as well as supportive social and economic infrastructures. Crop rotations Crop rotation consists of growing different crops in succession in the same field, as opposed to continually growing the same crop. Growing the same crop year after year guarantees pests of a food supply – and so pest populations increase. It can also lead to depletion of certain soil nutrients. Growing different crops interrupts pest life cycles and keeps their populations in check. Crop rotation principles can be applied to both broad acre and row crops alike. The principles may even be applied to pastures. In crop rotation cycles, farmers can also sow crops that like legumes that actually enrich the soil with nutrients, thereby reducing the need for chemical fertilisers. For example, many corn farmers alternate growing corn with soybeans, because soybeans fix nitrogen into the soil. Thus, subsequent corn crops require less nitrogen fertiliser to be added. MERITS OF ORGANIC FARMING Sustainability over the long term: Many changes observed in the environment are long term, occurring slowly over time. Organic agriculture considers the medium- and long-term effect of agricultural interventions on the agro-ecosystem. It aims to produce food while establishing an ecological balance to prevent soil infertility or pest problems. Organic agriculture takes a proactive approach as opposed to treating problems after they emerge. Soil. Soil building practices such as crop rotations, inter-cropping, symbiotic associations, cover crops, organic fertilizers and minimum tillage are central to organic practices. These encourage soil fauna and flora, improving soil formation and structure and creating more stable systems. In turn, nutrient and energy cycling is increased and the retentive abilities of the soil for nutrients and water are enhanced, compensating for the non-use of mineral fertilizers. Such management techniques also play an important role in soil erosion control. The length of time that the soil is exposed to erosive forces is decreased, soil biodiversity is increased, and nutrient losses are reduced, helping to maintain and enhance soil productivity. Crop export of nutrients is usually compensated by farm-derived renewable resources but it is sometimes necessary to supplement organic soils with potassium, phosphate, calcium, magnesium and trace elements from external sources. Water. In many agriculture areas, pollution of groundwater courses with synthetic fertilizers and pesticides is a major problem. As the use of these is prohibited in organic agriculture, they are replaced by organic fertilizers (e.g. compost, animal manure, green manure) and through the use of greater biodiversity (in terms of species cultivated and permanent vegetation), enhancing soil structure and water infiltration. Well managed organic systems with better nutrient retentive abilities, greatly reduce the risk of groundwater pollution. In some areas where pollution is a real problem, conversion to organic agriculture is highly encouraged as a restorative measure (e.g. by the Governments of France and Germany). Air and climate change. Organic agriculture reduces non-renewable energy use by decreasing agrochemical needs (these require high quantities of fossil fuel to be produced). Organic agriculture contributes to mitigating the greenhouse effect and global warming through its ability to sequester carbon in the soil. Many management practices used by organic agriculture (e.g. minimum tillage, returning crop residues to the soil, the use of cover crops and rotations, and the greater integration of nitrogen-fixing legumes), increase the return of carbon to the soil, raising productivity and favouring carbon storage. A number of studies revealed that soil organic carbon contents under organic farming are considerably higher. The more organic carbon is retained in the soil, the more the mitigation potential of agriculture against climate change is higher. However, there is much research needed in this field, yet. There is a lack of data on soil organic carbon for developing countries, with no farm system comparison data from Africa and Latin America, and only limited data on soil organic carbon stocks, which is crucial for determining carbon sequestration rates for farming practices. Biodiversity. Organic farmers are both custodians and users of biodiversity at all levels. At the gene level, traditional and adapted seeds and breeds are preferred for their greater resistance to diseases and their resilience to climatic stress. At the species level, diverse combinations of plants and animals optimize nutrient and energy cycling for agricultural production. At the ecosystem level, the maintenance of natural areas within and around organic fields and absence of chemical inputs create suitable habitats for wildlife. The frequent use of under-utilized species (often as rotation crops to build soil fertility) reduces erosion of agro-biodiversity, creating a healthier gene pool – the basis for future adaptation. The provision of structures providing food and shelter, and the lack of pesticide use, attract new or re-colonizing species to the organic area (both permanent and migratory), including wild flora and fauna (e.g. birds) and organisms beneficial to the orga nic system such as pollinators and pest predators. The number of studies on organic farming and biodiversity increased significantly within the last years. A recent study reporting on a meta-analysis of 766 scientific papers concluded that organic farming produces more biodiversity than other farming systems. Genetically modified organisms. The use of GMOs within organic systems is not permitted during any stage of organic food production, processing or handling. As the potential impact of GMOs to both the environment and health is not entirely understood, organic agriculture is taking the precautionary approach and choosing to encourage natural biodiversity. The organic label therefore provides an assurance that GMOs have not been used intentionally in the production and processing of the organic products. This is something which cannot be guaranteed in conventional products as labelling the presence of GMOs in food products has not yet come into force in most countries. However, with increasing GMO use in conventional agriculture and due to the method of transmission of GMOs in the environment (e.g. through pollen), organic agriculture will not be able to ensure that organic products are completely GMO free in the future. A detailed discussion on GMOs can be found in the FAO publication â€Å"Genetically Modified Organisms, Consumers, Food Safety and the Environment†. Ecological services. The impact of organic agriculture on natural resources favours interactions within the agro-ecosystem that are vital for both agricultural production and nature conservation. Ecological services derived include soil forming and conditioning, soil stabilization, waste recycling, carbon sequestration, nutrients cycling, predation, pollination and habitats. By opting for organic products, the consumer through his/her purchasing power promotes a less polluting agricultural system. The hidden costs of agriculture to the environment in terms of natural resource de gradation are reduced. Organic farming proves to be more profitable than the age-old traditional farming methods. It has been found that organic farming reduces the production cost by about 25 – 30%, as it does not involve the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, which thus makes organic farming very cost-effective. This type of farming leads to a less toxic environment as far as the air, water and soil is concerned. Soil is the most important component in farming, and organic farming preserves the soil by reducing soil erosion up to a large extent. Organic farming also enables the farmers to use the soil for a longer period of time to grow crops, as soil fertility is maintained for a long time in such a case. Organic farming has a positive effect on the ecosystem, as it proves vital in supporting the survival of wildlife in the lowlands. It even provides safe pasture lands for grazing. This kind of farming is not only beneficial to the farmers, but it also has proved useful for the dairy industry. Cattle grazing on organic farmlands have been found to be less prone to diseases, and they also yield more milk. These are definitely good signs for a consumer of these dairy products from a health perspective, and for a dairy organization from the profit perspective. Organic farming eliminates the chances that are there of the fast production of food through artificial means. Products or foodstuffs produced from organic farming neither contain any sort of artificial flavors or preservatives, nor do they contain any harmful chemicals. The original nutritional content of food is preserved due to the absence of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. Organic products moreover are tastier than the products yielded from traditional farming. Consumption of products obtained from organic farming minimizes the risks of physical ailments such as heart attacks, cancer, and ever strokes. Scientific studies have proven that organic foods are healthier than the inorganic ones Organic farming automatically promotes diverse habitats. At such places, one will find a place full of life with animals, birds and insects. Read more at Buzzle: http://www.buzzle.com/articles/benefits-of-organic-farming.html